<< | May 30, 2007 | >>

  

To Remake The World

Posted by Nipun Mehta on May 30, 2007

Here's a great article by Paul Hawken:

I have given nearly one thousand talks about the environment in the past fifteen years, and after every speech a smaller crowd gathered to talk, ask questions, and exchange business cards. The people offering their cards were working on the most salient issues of our day: climate change, poverty, deforestation, peace, water, hunger, conservation, human rights, and more. They were from the nonprofit and nongovernmental world, also known as civil society. They looked after rivers and bays, educated consumers about sustainable agriculture, retrofitted houses with solar panels, lobbied state legislatures about pollution, fought against corporate-weighted trade policies, worked to green inner cities, or taught children about the environment. Quite simply, they were trying to safeguard nature and ensure justice.

After being on the road for a week or two, I would return with a couple hundred cards stuffed into various pockets. I would lay them out on the table in my kitchen, read the names, look at the logos, envisage the missions, and marvel at what groups do on behalf of others. Later, I would put them into drawers or paper bags, keepsakes of the journey. I couldn’t throw them away.

Over the years the cards mounted into the thousands, and whenever I glanced at the bags in my closet, I kept coming back to one question: did anyone know how many groups there were? At first, this was a matter of curiosity, but it slowly grew into a hunch that something larger was afoot, a significant social movement that was eluding the radar of mainstream culture.

I began to count. [...] Extrapolating from the records being accessed, I realized that the initial estimate of a hundred thousand organizations was off by at least a factor of ten. I now believe there are over one million organizations working toward ecological sustainability and social justice. Maybe two.

By conventional definition, this is not a movement. Movements have leaders and ideologies. You join movements, study tracts, and identify yourself with a group. You read the biography of the founder(s) or listen to them perorate on tape or in person. Movements have followers, but this movement doesn’t work that way. It is dispersed, inchoate, and fiercely independent. There is no manifesto or doctrine, no authority to check with.

I sought a name for it, but there isn’t one.

Posted by Nipun Mehta | comments (1) | permalink | more 'Inspiration' | Bookmark and Share

Comments


On Jun 02, Jenny wrote:    Nipun--
Not two hours ago, I was standing at a Barnes & Noble in downtown Manhattan, having just discovered Hawken's book.
As I flipped through the introduction, it was utterly obvious that Charity Focus is exactly the kind of "dispersed, inchoate and fiercely independent" enterprise that Hawken is naming, and celebrating.
Here's to CF, to the many movements like it, and to grand paradigm shifts!
--Jenny
 

Add A Comment

Name:
Email: (will not be published on site)
Comment:

Spam Block:

Please enter the code that you read below.
Captcha Puzzle :  
 
Our Websites
 
Recent Posts
 
 
 
Archives
 
Stay Connected





Add to Google